quinta-feira, 16 de junho de 2016

If states do not end up with hatred, insecurity and social inequality will fail to end terrorism!



Photo
Preserved unchanged, it is “a stark and powerful symbol of the most destructive force ever created by humankind,” says a UNESCO * article. In 1996 the building was added to the UNESCO World Heritage List as the Hiroshima Peace Memorial.

Sadly, though, such poignant memorials have not stopped war, which is often caused by greed, nationalism, and racial, religious, and tribal hatred. So, will warfare always be with us?

What about terrorism?

Terrorism is systematic, premeditated and calculated. The primary objective is not to produce a large number of deaths and injuries. The carnage is only a means to an end. It helps to create the atmosphere of bewilderment and fear that terrorists want, in order to discredit the authorities and publicize their cause. Let's look at some factors that are behind the violent terrorist acts.

Hate. 'Terrorism fuel is hate, "says Louis J. Freeh, the FBI director. "Those who nourish this hatred live in a world painted in the colors of prejudice, marked by conspiracy hues and framed by ignorance."

Oppression. "You have to admit that the irrational goal of the leaders of certain groups and some countries is to annihilate other cultures," writes Stephen Bowman in his book When the Eagle Screams (The Eagle's Cry). "But it is also obvious that much of the terrorism is born of despair."

Frustration. "In so many cases, the basic motivation of the terrorist is a genuine frustration with political, social and economic forces seemingly immutable, "says the editor of the book Urban Terrorism.

Injustice. "Terrorism is the symptom of a problem, not the actual cause," says Michael Shimoff, in his essay "The terrorist policy". He continues: "Our long-term goal should be to eliminate the social causes of terrorism and basic policies. While we fight terrorism, we must also make vigorous efforts to enhance freedom, dignity, justice and humanitarian values. Only when those vigorous efforts have effect it is that we can turn our operations to combat terrorism and counterterrorism. "

The truth is that human efforts to combat terrorism - even if the motivation is sincere - will not succeed in dealing with the causes of the problem. The solution to the problem of terrorism is beyond human capacity.

"The technology that aims to thwart terrorist attacks on commercial airlines could not accomplish what scientists expected," says New Scientist magazine. "After several years of experimentation, no detection system meets the minimum requirements set by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, acronym in English)." The agency wanted a system to make a scanning electron ten bags per minute, which detect "several kilos" explosive 95 percent of the time, which, however, present a false alarm rate "next" 1 to 2 percent. However, the devices that use X-rays and metal detectors cannot detect the "current favorite weapon of terror" - the plastic explosives. Was used a plastic explosive to jet the Pan American exploding over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988.

The well-known German Journalist Fritz René Allemann explains so their strategy: "The terror - sometimes used the most brutal and cruel way, the highly refined times and cunningly executed - seeks to achieve the upper classes and shake the lower classes from their lethargy and fatalistic resignation, by demonstrating to them that governments and the rulers are not beyond reach.

So it is that the methods of religious conflict in Northern Ireland and the "liberation movements" minority in other countries have spread to the prosperous countries of the West. "The urban guerrillas" move in the middle of modern cities like jungles, whose huge apartment buildings and impersonal streets offer shelter and cover. lightning attacks, including bank robberies, bombs, "executions" of unpopular politicians and prominent personalities of kidnapping to force the release of imprisoned comrades, have become the order of the day.

In the meantime, another factor, often overlooked, greatly contributes to this climate of violence. Which is?

Clerical involvement

A religious person would, in all honesty, ask why religion has not been more effective in moderating the political violence. It is not Christianity opposed to violence and use of force? Does not advocate before, love of neighbor?

Heinrich Albertz, the former mayor of Berlin, ordained minister of the Evangelical (Lutheran) and synod member, provides a glimpse of the answer. During a television interview in late 1974, admitted: ". We are all guilty of things have come to this point because they are, after all, our sons and daughters".  His words are the fact that one of the four alleged leaders of the notorious German terrorist group Baader-Meinhof, who is up against five counts of murder and numerous counts of attempted murder, bank robbery, arson, bombings, currency counterfeiting, and theft of large amount, is daughter of a Protestant minister ordered!

In fact, the majority of Catholic and Protestant clergymen not affirm openly advocating violence and terror. But the statements of these clerics are a lower measure of its contribution to terrorism than their actions. Are very similar to the parent who tells the child not to smoke, but fails to help you understand fully why, while at the same time, he continues to smoke - so encouraging wrongdoing. Therefore, the clergy may condemn what terrorists do, but they themselves have cultivated the soil in which the seeds of terror and violence have taken root and flourished. As well?
Well, consider the methods of religious leaders during the hundreds of years in the Middle Ages when they were strong enough to impose its will on the state. It is not true that their bloody crusades, terrifying inquisitions, burning of "heretics" witch hunt, "conversions" by the sword, and other violent tactics, fill the pages of history with evidence that they had no aversion to terror and violence when it was advantageous to them? Is the time changed this underlying acceptance of violence?
The history of the two world wars in the heart of Christianity answers that not! The historical record shows that political leaders on both sides of the two conflicts could count on the fervent support of the churches to send their young people to commit violence. He said Major General Brigadier English, Frank P. Crozier ". The Christian Churches are the best promoters of eagerness to see blood we have, and made them free use" Religious terror continues in Northern Ireland continues to demonstrate this tendency to violence among the peoples of Christendom, no matter how many words of peace come out of the mouth of the clergy.
So, just missed small step to some clerics who supported violence warrior type for God and country "would advocate violence in support of political causes that some people believe" fair ". Advocating this, the pastor of the Presbyterian University, Henry W. Malcolm wrote during the period of the revolt of radical students against the Vietnam War:
"Those who complain that the clergy should not be involved in public issues such as politics, economy, poverty, war and peace, not really understand the history of the ministry.  It is they who provide visible evidence of the most basic teachings of their faith. This does not go unnoticed of radical students across the nation. "
Hence, showing the extent to which the clergy may engage in political movements, as well as simple words, Malcolm says:
"If this also means that some action has to be taken to change society addressed in free society, one should also try it. In all, that's why the campus pastor becomes involved with the radical students. "
News now pile up is churchmen involved in the movements of "liberation" around the globe. Many not only verbally advocate the overthrow of that label systems "oppressive", but the real participation of themselves in this violence. So lend an air of respectability moral violence, as if it were the will of God. Typical are the words of the Colombian Catholic priest Camillo Torres, who died some time ago under a hail of bullets soldiers:
"Revolution means to install a government that feeds the hungry, the naked view and instruct the ignorant, in short, a pursuing love.  For this reason, the revolution is not only a possibility for Christians, but indeed a duty, if it is the only effective means of achieving this love for everyone. "
You can blame the modern-day young people are led to believe that the way to achieve a just society is through their own efforts - that act in harmony with the will of God, who does not want or cannot act? William F. Starr, Protestant advisor at Columbia University, noted that the concept of the late German Protestant theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, was that it is "the world itself, the man himself as living in the world that meets needs and tackles problems and not God. " To this, add Starr: "As Bonhoeffer listeners, do not ask more for God to do what man can do for yourself and for each other."
So, if the man takes care of himself, then "destroy what is destroying you!" Seems to many to be a legitimate solution of frustration at the failure of human governments. But is it?
It would be shortsighted to believe that terrorists are wrong in all their conclusions. Instead of overlooked is the fact they recognize the failure of the current systems in dealing with political, economic, racial and environmental problems. But is your solution - a violent replacement of current systems by other chosen by themselves - is correct? Or was it simply exchange one form of oppression by imperfect humans otherwise?

On the other hand, that results of their efforts can have those who advocate that operates "within the system"? Although talk and work too, is the condition of the affairs of the world is moving in the right direction? The existence of increasingly poor, unemployed, illiterate, hungry and homeless - and now the largest number of refugees - responds emphatically: No!

Not shown imperfect humans, adequately enough, they cannot make the necessary global changes to bring peace and happiness to all mankind?

We all are guilty if don't take action so as not collapses de world.
Milu Ramalho
16-06.2016

Sem comentários: